# Strategic Overview As of 12 March 2026, marking the thirteenth day of coordinated United States and Israeli military actions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, the geopolitical architecture of the Middle East has entered a phase of severe structural destabilization. This joint military campaign, formally designated as Operation Epic Fury by the United States and Operation Roaring Lion by Israel, was initiated on 28 February 2026 and commenced with high-intensity decapitation strikes that resulted in the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.[1] The opening phases of the conflict achieved extensive degradation of Iran's nuclear infrastructure, ballistic-missile launch sites, integrated air-defense systems, and critical command-and-control nodes. Within this highly volatile, multi-domain battlespace, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has adopted a meticulously calibrated posture of asymmetric stabilization. Beijing's approach combines high-volume diplomatic condemnation of US-Israeli actions with uninterrupted, highly opaque economic engagement that sustains the Iranian state's financial viability. Despite the intensity of the conflict and the profound vulnerability of its foremost Middle Eastern strategic partner, exhaustive all-source intelligence fusion indicates that there is no corroborated evidence of the PRC providing direct, post-conflict material, military, or logistical reinforcement to Tehran.[1] Instead, the PRC relies entirely on pre-existing sanctions-evasion architectures, cyber-espionage operations, and space-domain integrations (specifically the BeiDou-3 navigation network, which were established long before the outbreak of hostilities. The strategic calculus driving the PRC is anchored in a strict hierarchy of core doctrinal interests. Foremost among these is the imperative to secure uninterrupted energy flows to fuel its domestic economy, followed closely by the preservation of its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) infrastructure investments.[1] Furthermore, Beijing recognizes a historic opportunity to exploit the systemic distraction of the United States military to alter the correlation of forces in the Indo-Pacific. By ensuring that the Iranian regime does not face total systemic collapse, while simultaneously refraining from direct military entanglement that would invite secondary sanctions or kinetic retaliation, Beijing effectively delegates the burden of resisting American hegemony to Tehran.[8] This allows the PRC to act as the primary beneficiary of the conflict, absorbing discounted Iranian crude oil and watching with strategic patience as US munitions stockpiles, which are absolutely critical for any future contingency in the Taiwan Strait, are rapidly depleted in the sands of the Middle East.[11] This comprehensive assessment provides a multi-domain analysis of the PRC's involvement in the 2026 crisis. It evaluates the shift in Beijing's diplomatic strategy from hedging to wedging, deconstructs the mechanics of its dark fleet energy lifeline and covert financial architectures, analyzes the integration of its military-grade intelligence systems into Iranian strike complexes, and projects the broader macro-strategic implications for global security and the impending Taiwan contingency. # Operational Context: Operation Epic Fury and the Regional Conflagration To accurately assess the PRC's posture, it is necessary to establish the operational realities of the conflict that Beijing is currently observing and exploiting. Operation Epic Fury represents the most significant application of American military force in the region since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, unfolding across a theater that is central to China's energy security and commercial ambitions.[5] The campaign began with a wave of highly expensive, long-range standoff weapons designed to destroy Iranian command, control, and air defenses from a safe distance.[4] Within the first 100 hours of the operation, US forces expended 168 sea-launched Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles (TLAMs) and 56 air-launched Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSMs), alongside 216 anti-radiation missiles utilized specifically to suppress Iranian air defense networks.[4] The Israeli Air Force paralleled this effort by targeting ten of Iran’s eighteen primary air bases, cratering runways, destroying hardened aircraft shelters, and systematically neutralizing the Islamic Republic's air deterrent.[4] A notable joint strike package targeted Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport—a critical logistical hub long associated with the IRGC Quds Force, resulting in the destruction of at least 17 aircraft utilized for transporting weapons to proxy militias across the region.[4] As coalition air superiority was established over Iranian airspace, US forces underwent a significant operational shift, transitioning from standoff weapons to stand-in precision strikes utilizing far less expensive Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs).4 By the end of the first week, the US military had struck more than 3,000 targets, a figure that escalated to approximately 5,000 targets by the tenth day of the campaign.[4] Concurrently, American naval and air assets engaged and neutralized more than 50 Iranian warships and submarines, severely curtailing the conventional maritime threat posed by the Islamic Republic of Iran Navy (IRIN).[4] However, the Iranian response has been devastatingly asymmetrical, triggering a region-wide conflagration that directly threatens the PRC's economic lifelines. In response to the decapitation strikes, Tehran launched a massive retaliatory campaign utilizing over 500 ballistic missiles and approximately 2,000 Shahed-variant loitering munitions.4 These strikes were not limited to Israeli territory but were distributed across the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, targeting military installations and critical energy infrastructure in Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.[3] The geographic expansion of the conflict poses severe hydro-strategic and economic risks. Iranian drones and missiles have targeted desalination plants and their associated power co-generation facilities across the Gulf.[4] Because desalination provides 90% of the drinking water in Kuwait, 86% in Oman, and 70% in Saudi Arabia, these facilities represent a geopolitical wildcard; their destruction could render major urban centers uninhabitable within a week, forcing immediate capitulation or catastrophic escalation.[4] It is within this highly destructive, multi-front environment that the PRC has deployed its diplomatic and economic statecraft. # Diplomatic Maneuvering: The Transition to a "Wedging" Strategy Prior to the outbreak of the 2026 conflict, the PRC’s approach to the Middle East was defined by a strategy of "hedging".[18] This involved maintaining balanced, functional relationships with all regional actors, including Iran, Israel, and the GCC, while prioritizing economic integration and energy diversification without directly challenging the US regional security architecture.[18] However, the initiation of Operation Epic Fury has accelerated a definitive shift in Chinese foreign policy from hedging to "wedging".[18] This strategy actively attempts to exploit the space between the United States and its regional partners, utilizing the crisis to fracture the US alliance network and promote a Beijing-centric vision for the international order. Since the onset of the strikes, the PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has maintained a continuous barrage of rhetorical condemnation. Senior officials, including Foreign Minister Wang Yi and spokespersons Mao Ning and Fu Cong, have systematically framed the US-Israeli operations as unacceptable violations of the United Nations Charter, blatant infringements of Iranian territorial sovereignty, and the illegal assassination of a sovereign state leader.[1] Within the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), Beijing coordinated with the Russian Federation to abstain on resolutions demanding that Iran halt its retaliatory attacks in the Persian Gulf (voting 13-0-2), while continuously utilizing the platform to demand an immediate ceasefire and dialogue.[1] This rhetorical positioning serves a dual purpose. First, it affords Iran a degree of diplomatic legitimacy, contextualizing its retaliatory strikes as acts of sovereign self-defense against unilateral Western aggression, a narrative that resonates deeply within the Global South.[5] Second, it deliberately contrasts China's purported commitment to peace, multipolarity, and non-interference with the United States' reliance on kinetic force and regime-change operations, thereby enhancing China's normative appeal among developing nations.[22] Recognizing that Iran's retaliation against GCC infrastructure threatens its own energy security, Beijing rapidly deployed its Special Envoy on the Middle East Issue, Zhai Jun, to conduct intense shuttle diplomacy across the region.[24] By 8 March 2026, Zhai Jun held high-level meetings in Riyadh with Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud and GCC Secretary-General Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi, followed by visits to the United Arab Emirates to meet with Deputy Prime Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan.[25] During these engagements, Zhai explicitly praised the GCC states for their restraint, reiterated China's absolute commitment to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Gulf nations, and condemned attacks on civilian infrastructure.[25] This sophisticated diplomatic maneuvering is the essence of the wedging strategy. By presenting itself as the only major power capable of maintaining open, constructive channels with both Tehran and Riyadh, building upon the diplomatic capital generated by its brokering of the 2023 Saudi-Iranian normalization, China subtly reshapes the regional security paradigm.[19] The underlying message delivered to the GCC is that reliance on the United States security umbrella inevitably invites devastating Iranian retaliation and regional instability, whereas economic and political alignment with Beijing guarantees geopolitical mediation and the restraint of Iranian proxies.[19] # Economic Statecraft: The Dark Fleet and Sanctions Circumvention The survival of the Iranian state mechanism under the crushing weight of Operation Epic Fury, compounded by years of historical US maximum-pressure sanctions, relies almost entirely on its ability to export crude oil. The PRC serves as the indispensable terminal node for this economic lifeline, absorbing approximately 90% of Iran's total crude exports, which accounted for an estimated $46.7 billion in revenue in the years leading up to the conflict.[1] Despite the severe kinetic degradation of Iran's military infrastructure and Tehran's own partial blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, maritime intelligence indicates that Iranian crude continues to flow to Chinese ports at a remarkable rate of 1.3 to 1.6 million barrels per day. ## The Mechanics of the Shadow Fleet The uninterrupted transit of this vital energy resource is facilitated by a highly sophisticated "dark fleet" (or shadow fleet) of tankers operating outside conventional maritime regulatory frameworks.[32] The PRC provides a de-facto safe harbor and a captive market for these vessels, which employ a complex, multi-layered array of deceptive shipping practices to obfuscate the origin of their cargo and shield Chinese entities from secondary sanctions.[32] Vessels engaged in this illicit trade frequently employ Automatic Identification System (AIS) blackouts or active spoofing.[32] Real-time tracking data reveals a trend wherein vessels broadcast manipulated AIS data that artificially identifies them as "China-linked".1 This tactic exploits a perceived "sovereign immunity," deterring US or Israeli naval forces from interdicting the vessels out of fear of provoking a direct diplomatic or military confrontation with Beijing.[1] Furthermore, these networks continuously exploit "flags of convenience" from jurisdictions with notoriously lax maritime oversight, such as Cameroon or Panama, while registering vessel ownership through obscure shell companies and special purpose vehicles in the Marshall Islands, Hong Kong, and Malaysia (e.g., Bestla Company Limited, Dexiang Shipping Co., Oceanic Orbit Incorporated).[32] To further launder the origin of the oil, tankers operated by the National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC) routinely conduct covert ship-to-ship (STS) transfers in international waters, predominantly off the coasts of Malaysia, Singapore, or Indonesia.[32] For example, vessels such as the RESTON and the BESTLA have been documented receiving millions of barrels of Iranian crude from sanctioned NITC tankers via nighttime STS transfers before proceeding to Chinese ports.[32] Once transferred, the oil is systematically rebranded with falsified bills of lading and certificates of origin, allowing Chinese customs to officially record the imports as originating from Malaysia, Oman, or the UAE.[30] ## The Teapot Refinery Ecosystem The ultimate destination for this sanctioned crude is a vast network of independent "teapot" refineries clustered primarily in China's Shandong Province.[30] Unlike the massive state-owned energy conglomerates (such as Sinopec or CNPC), which possess deep exposure to the US financial system and are highly vulnerable to secondary sanctions, these independent refineries exist entirely to process discounted, sanctioned crude.[30] Refineries such as the Shandong Shengxing Chemical Co. purchase the Iranian crude, utilizing front companies like the China Oil and Petroleum Company Limited (COPC) to launder billions of dollars outside the purview of the US dollar system.[32] The intentional dispersion of these illicit purchases among numerous small, independent entities provides the PRC with plausible deniability while ensuring the continuous flow of energy necessary for domestic stability.[32] ## Sovereign Risk and the "Cognitive Shield" Iran's strategic decision to maintain the flow of oil to China, even as it actively targets commercial shipping and energy infrastructure belonging to US allies in the Persian Gulf, is driven by a profound sovereign risk calculation.[31] Approximately 70% of Iran's non-oil trade, including its absolutely critical food and agricultural imports, depends on transit through the Strait of Hormuz.[31] Executing a total, suicidal blockade of the Strait would not only trigger immediate domestic economic collapse and mass starvation but would also invite severe diplomatic and economic retaliation from Beijing, whose own energy security is highly vulnerable to oil price spikes approaching the $100 per barrel threshold.[1] Consequently, the PRC acts as a "Cognitive Shield" for the Iranian regime.[31] The existential necessity of supplying China inherently constrains Iranian escalation in the maritime domain, while simultaneously deterring the US coalition from indiscriminately destroying the dark fleet, knowing that severing China's energy lifeline could force Beijing into a far more aggressive, potentially kinetic posture.[31] # Financial Architecture: CIMS, CIPS, and the "Chuxin" Barter Mechanism To sustain this multibillion-dollar energy trade without triggering catastrophic secondary sanctions against its tier-one financial institutions, the PRC and Iran have collaboratively engineered an opaque, multi-layered financial architecture designed to completely bypass the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) network and the US dollar hegemony.[30] ## The CIMS and CIPS Dichotomy A precise analysis of the bilateral financial plumbing requires a clear delineation between two distinct but complementary systems: the Iranian-developed CIMS and the Chinese-developed CIPS.[36] The Cross-Border Interbank Messaging System (CIMS) was developed by the sanctioned RUNC Exchange System Company (also known as RUNC International Banking Solutions) under the direct authorization of the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) in late 2023.[37] CIMS is a bespoke, highly encrypted financial messaging protocol specifically designed to insulate the Iranian regime’s foreign transactions from Western surveillance and control.[37] It acts as the secure, clandestine conduit connecting Iranian financial nodes to willing offshore partners.[37] Most notably, CIMS is utilized to establish direct connections with the US-sanctioned Bank of Kunlun in China, where vast reserves of Iranian oil revenue are deposited.[37] To further obfuscate these flows, the CBI utilizes front entities such as the Cyrus Offshore Bank (a purportedly independent entity secretly operated by Iran's sanctioned Parsian Bank on Kish Island) to route funds from the Bank of Kunlun directly to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).[37] Conversely, the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) is the PRC's official, state-backed clearing and settlement system designed to internationalize the Renminbi (RMB).[36] While CIPS provides a structural, macro-economic alternative to US dollar hegemony, its immediate utility for direct, high-volume sanctions evasion is currently limited.[36] The vast majority of China's global trade remains dollar-denominated, and CIPS itself frequently relies on the SWIFT messaging infrastructure for its daily operations.[36] Therefore, rather than exposing CIPS to crippling secondary sanctions by openly onboarding heavily sanctioned Iranian state banks, Beijing relies on highly localized barter arrangements and the CIMS-to-Kunlun nexus to process bilateral trade quietly.[37] ## The Sinosure-Backed "Chuxin" Barter Conduit The most sophisticated and financially significant mechanism ensuring the flow of resources between Beijing and Tehran is a closed-loop "oil-for-infrastructure" barter arrangement.[30] This system functions entirely outside the parameters of international fiat currency transfers, rendering traditional US Treasury sanctions mechanisms practically impotent.[41] Under this architecture, an Iranian-controlled entity (typically affiliated with the Naftiran Intertrade Company) books massive crude oil sales to a Chinese buyer connected to the state-owned trader Zhuhai Zhenrong.[40] Instead of remitting cash payments back to Tehran, which would easily be flagged and intercepted by global financial monitors, the Chinese buyer deposits the equivalent funds into an obscure, unregistered financial vehicle known as "Chuxin".[30] In 2024 alone, an estimated $8.4 billion flowed through this specific conduit.[30] Chuxin does not transfer these funds to Iran. Instead, it disburses the money domestically to Chinese contractors who are executing massive engineering, aerospace, and infrastructure projects within Iran.[40] The entire chain of these high-risk transactions is underwritten and insured by the China Export and Credit Insurance Corporation (Sinosure), a massive state-backed entity administered directly by the PRC Ministry of Finance.[30] By effectively trapping the oil revenue within the Chinese domestic financial system and converting it into physical infrastructure built by Chinese labor inside Iran, this mechanism guarantees the continued development of the Iranian state while shielding Chinese corporations from international financial penalties.[41] # Military-Technical Integration: The "Intelligentised Kill Chain" While open-source satellite imagery, shipping manifests, and signals intelligence reveal no corroborated evidence of massive PRC weapons transfers—such as the delivery of DF-series ballistic missiles, HQ-9B surface-to-air missile systems, or YJ-series anti-ship missiles—since the commencement of Operation Epic Fury on 28 February, China's most profound contribution to Iran's war effort is systemic and architectural.[1] The PRC has effectively outsourced precision strike capabilities to Iran via deep space-domain integration, fundamentally altering the tactical geometry of the current conflict.1 ## BeiDou-3 Integration and the Defeat of Israeli Electronic Warfare During the brief but highly instructive 12-Day War in June 2025, Israeli electronic warfare (EW) and GPS spoofing tactics successfully neutralized a significant percentage of inbound Iranian loitering munitions and ballistic missiles, exposing a critical structural vulnerability in Tehran's strike architecture.[6] In response to this failure, Tehran aggressively accelerated the integration of its strike complexes with China’s BeiDou-3 (BDS-3) satellite navigation system, a technological pivot facilitated by the framework of the 2021 PRC-Iran 25-Year Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement.[47] By the outbreak of Operation Epic Fury in early March 2026, Iranian forces had fully activated BeiDou-3 integration across their entire arsenal of drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic weapons.45 Crucially, Iran was granted access to the restricted, military-tier B3A signal.[6] Unlike civilian-grade GPS signals, which operate on fixed radio frequencies highly susceptible to jamming and spoofing, the B3A signal utilizes complex frequency hopping and Navigation Message Authentication (NMA).[6] This cryptographic hardening allows Iranian hardware to simply reject false coordinates broadcast by Israeli jammers, reportedly maintaining a 98% positioning success rate even in highly contested, saturated electromagnetic environments.[6] Furthermore, BeiDou-3's triple-frequency architecture enables real-time ionospheric error correction, granting Iranian ballistic missiles a Circular Error Probability (CEP) of less than five meters.6 ## The Information Support Force and Real-Time Targeting This integration represents what military analysts term an "intelligentised kill chain".[46] By marrying Chinese orbital infrastructure (the "Eyes") with Iranian kinetic systems (the "Fist"), Tehran bypasses Western technological leverage entirely.46 While explicitly unconfirmed by classified sources, speculative intelligence derived from French DGSE reporting suggests that the PLA's newly restructured Information Support Force (established in April 2024 to oversee networks, space surveillance, and cyber operations) may be facilitating real-time or near-real-time intelligence sharing.[1] Leveraging China's fleet of over 500 Earth-observation and SIGINT satellites—specifically the Yaogan network—this architecture hypothetically allows Iran to identify and strike dynamic targets, such as repositioning US naval assets or temporary gaps in Israeli air defenses.[46] The US-Israel conflict is thus serving as a live-fire laboratory for the PLA, providing real-time data on the resilience of BeiDou-3 and the performance of Chinese sensors against US stealth assets and electronic warfare.[52] ## The Stalled Proliferation of Conventional Systems Despite deep C4ISR integration, Beijing has demonstrated notable restraint regarding the transfer of heavy, conventional kinetic platforms. Pre-war negotiations, which intensified significantly over the summer of 2025, indicated that Tehran was close to securing the CM-302—the export variant of China's highly lethal YJ-12 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile.[53] Designed specifically to strike large naval vessels, including aircraft carriers, at ranges of up to 460 kilometers while traveling at Mach 3 and carrying a 500-kilogram warhead, the deployment of the CM-302 along the Iranian coastline would severely threaten the US Navy's ability to operate in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.[54] However, the complete absence of shipping manifests or satellite imagery confirming the delivery of these systems post-28 February suggests that Beijing has intentionally frozen the transfer.[1] This freeze is likely a calculated maneuver to prevent Iran from completely closing the Strait of Hormuz—which would devastate China's own energy imports—and to avoid providing Washington with an explicit casus belli to enact crippling secondary sanctions against major Chinese defense conglomerates.[1] # Regime Survival and Internal Iranian Political Dynamics The ultimate efficacy of China’s strategy of asymmetric stabilization is inherently contingent upon the survival of the Iranian regime. The US-Israeli decapitation strikes on 28 February, which successfully eliminated Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei alongside dozens of senior security and military officials, severely tested the institutional resilience of the Islamic Republic.[1] ## The Ascension of Mojtaba Khamenei Following the unprecedented death of the Supreme Leader, the regime's carefully managed, decades-long succession plans dissolved into wartime exigency.[57] The immediate constitutional activation of a three-person Interim Leadership Council—comprising President Masoud Pezeshkian, Chief Justice Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje'i, and Ayatollah Alireza Arafi—threatened to paralyze the state through intense factional infighting during its most vulnerable moment.[58] Factions aligned with security council chief Ali Larijani preferred extending the interim council's authority, while hardliners pushed for immediate consolidation.[59] To prevent total institutional collapse and military paralysis, the Assembly of Experts bypassed traditional consensus-building and rapidly elevated Mojtaba Khamenei (the late leader's son) to the position of Supreme Leader by 9 March 2026.[57] While deeply controversial and entirely contradictory to the anti-dynastic, anti-hereditary ethos of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Mojtaba's ascension was heavily backed by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the hardline political clergy.[4] Immediately following the election, all branches of the Iranian military apparatus issued official statements pledging absolute allegiance to Mojtaba, signaling a total militarization of the state apparatus.[4] ## IRGC Consolidation and Beijing's Calculated Tolerance The resulting power structure is highly decentralized operationally yet ideologically hardened at the strategic level.[63] With the formal civilian government marginalized, executive and military authority has been devolved to provincial IRGC governors.[63] This decentralized command structure ensures that IRGC missile and drone units can continue offensive operations and maintain the retaliatory barrage even while central command nodes in Tehran remain suppressed by United States air superiority.[4] From Beijing's strategic perspective, this internal outcome is highly optimal. While a secular, democratic revolution in Iran might eventually produce a government more integrated with the West (thereby depriving China of a key anti-US proxy in the Middle East), the rapid consolidation of a highly militarized, deeply sanctioned regime under Mojtaba Khamenei ensures that Iran will remain totally economically and technologically dependent on the PRC.[8] Beijing will almost certainly leverage this extreme dependency in the coming months to extract even deeper discounts on crude oil imports and to secure long-term, highly favorable leases on critical Iranian infrastructure, such as the Chabahar port facilities, effectively vassalizing the Iranian economy without firing a shot.[1] # Cyber, AI, and the Informational Domain Operation Epic Fury has witnessed the unprecedented convergence of conventional kinetic strikes with advanced cyber-espionage and artificial intelligence (AI) targeting algorithms, generating entirely new vectors of great power competition and informational warfare.[2] ## The Algorithmic Battlefield and Propaganda Responses According to open-source reporting and subsequent massive amplification by Chinese state media, US Central Command (CENTCOM) heavily integrated artificial intelligence models into its kill chains.[66] Reports indicate that AI systems—analogous to Anthropic’s Claude—were utilized to rapidly synthesize massive volumes of satellite imagery, signals intelligence, and surveillance feeds in real-time.[66] On the first day of operations alone, these AI systems allegedly generated over 1,000 prioritized targets, providing commanders with automated GPS coordinates, weapon-to-target matching recommendations, and pre-calculated legal justifications regarding collateral damage.[66] The PRC's state-controlled propaganda apparatus, heavily orchestrated by outlets such as the Global Times and People's Daily, immediately seized upon this narrative.[31] Chinese defense spokespersons publicly warned the United States against letting AI "determine life and death on the battlefield," accusing Washington of eroding ethical constraints and accountability in warfare.[67] This messaging aligns perfectly with China's broader Global South narrative strategy, portraying the US as a reckless, techno-imperialist power that treats the Middle East as a live-fire testing ground for dangerous algorithmic warfare, contrasting it with China's calls for restraint and human-centric governance.[22] ## State-Aligned Cyber Espionage (UNK_InnerAmbush) Operating in the shadows of the kinetic conflict, PRC-aligned Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups have actively exploited the fog of war to fulfill strategic intelligence requirements. Beginning on 1 March 2026, just 24 hours after the initiation of Operation Epic Fury, cybersecurity researchers identified a suspected China-nexus threat actor, designated UNK_InnerAmbush, executing a highly targeted spear-phishing campaign against Middle Eastern government and diplomatic organizations.[7] Utilizing compromised email infrastructure (such as "uzbembish@elcat[.]kg") and deceptive lures related to the death of Ayatollah Khamenei and fabricated intelligence reports purportedly from the US State Department, the threat actor sought to breach the networks of key regional players.[7] This activity indicates a distinct shift in PLA cyber priorities, pivoting from standard intellectual property theft to aggressive, real-time intelligence collection.[7] The PLA is actively seeking regional intelligence regarding the trajectory of the war, the stability of GCC governments, and the operational disposition of US forces, utilizing the conflict as a topical social engineering pretext.[7] This aligns with the recently observed, highly aggressive PRC cyber posturing against US critical infrastructure, notably the Volt Typhoon and Salt Typhoon botnet infiltrations designed to pre-position for future conflicts.[68] # Global Macro-Strategic Impact: Munitions Depletion and the Taiwan Contingency The PRC's calculus regarding Operation Epic Fury extends far beyond the borders of the Middle East. Beijing perceives the conflict through the overarching lens of Great Power Competition, specifically evaluating how a prolonged, high-intensity US engagement in Iran alters the global correlation of forces, particularly regarding a potential contingency in the Taiwan Strait.[10] ## The Munitions Attrition Horizon The most significant, tangible strategic dividend for the PRC resulting from the current conflict is the rapid and unsustainable depletion of US precision-guided munitions (PGMs) and advanced air defense interceptors.[12] In the first 100 hours of Operation Epic Fury alone, the US expended an estimated $3.7 billion, largely driven by the high cost of munitions.[4] The opening phases required massive salvos of "exquisite" standoff weapons to suppress Iranian integrated air defense networks.[4] However, the offensive expenditure pales in comparison to the defensive crisis. Defending US forward operating bases and regional allies from over 800 Iranian ballistic missiles and 2,000 Shahed-variant drones has forced the US military to expend thousands of high-end, highly expensive interceptors, including Standard Missile-3s (SM-3), THAAD interceptors, and Patriot PAC-3s.[4] The production lines for these interceptors within the US defense-industrial base are operating at maximum capacity but remain wholly inadequate to replace combat expenditures in real-time.[12] Wargames conducted by prominent defense think tanks, such as the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), in 2023 and 2025 consistently indicated that in a high-intensity conflict over Taiwan, US submarines and aircraft would expend their critical anti-ship and land-attack cruise missiles within the first week of fighting.[72] By provoking Iran into a sustained counterattack using cheap, mass-produced drones and ballistic missiles, Beijing observes the US bleeding irreplaceable strategic depth.[8] Every SM-3 fired to defend an airbase in the Persian Gulf is a highly advanced interceptor that cannot be deployed to the First Island Chain to defend Guam, Okinawa, or US carrier strike groups from incoming barrages by the PLA Rocket Force (PLARF).[12] ## The Inverse Thucydides Trap and Accelerated PLA Modernization As the US military becomes structurally bogged down in the Middle East—validating Beijing's design of the region as a "second front" that Washington can never afford to leave—the PRC is rapidly augmenting its own capabilities.[10] On 5 March 2026, coinciding with the height of the US air campaign against Iran, PRC Premier Li Qiang announced a 7% increase in the defense budget at the National People's Congress.[11] Li accompanied this funding surge with unprecedentedly strident rhetoric, vowing to "resolutely crack down on separatist activities" in Taiwan, signaling an accelerated timeline for achieving the PLA's 2027 Centennial Military Building Goals.[11] This dynamic reflects what strategic analysts term an "Inverse Thucydides Trap".[9] Rather than initiating a direct, hegemonic war to challenge the incumbent power, the rising power (China) utilizes the geographic overextension, munitions depletion, and systemic distraction of the incumbent hegemon (the US) to solidify local supremacy in its primary theater of interest without initiating direct hostilities with its main rival.[9] In response to these vulnerabilities, US defense planners at the Hudson Institute have proposed redesigning the US Air Force into an "Edge Force" (forward-deployed, runway-independent units), a "Pulsed Force" (long-range bombers), and a "Core Force," but transitioning to this posture requires time and resources currently being consumed in the Middle East.[4] # Strategic Forecast and Indicators & Warnings (I&W) Based on the synthesis of diplomatic, economic, and military data spanning the first 13 days of Operation Epic Fury, the PRC is assessed with Moderate-High confidence to maintain its current posture of non-belligerent economic enablement. Beijing will not intervene kinetically to save the Iranian military apparatus, but it will intervene economically and diplomatically to save the Iranian state. ## Near-Term Projections (3 to 6 Months) As US and Israeli strikes continue to systematically degrade formal Iranian export terminals such as Kharg Island, Iran will increasingly rely on distributed, hardened nodes such as the Jask Oil Terminal to maintain exports.[31] A commensurate surge in AIS-spoofed, "China-linked" shadow fleet tankers operating via STS transfers in Southeast Asia is highly probable to maintain the vital 1.3 mbpd baseline.[1] Concurrently, the extensive destruction of Iranian civilian and military infrastructure will force Tehran to rely entirely on Chinese reconstruction capabilities. Expect a rapid, aggressive expansion of the "Chuxin" financial barter mechanism, backed unconditionally by Sinosure, to deploy Chinese state-owned enterprises into Iran under the guise of post-conflict stabilization.[30] Diplomatically, Special Envoy Zhai Jun will likely attempt to formally sponsor a new regional security dialogue that explicitly excludes the United States. He will leverage GCC fears of future Iranian proxy strikes on highly vulnerable desalination plants and oil infrastructure to pull the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman further into Beijing's geopolitical and economic orbit.[4] ## Medium-Term Projections (12 to 24 Months) The proven operational resilience and tactical success of the BeiDou-3 B3A signal against sophisticated Western electronic warfare during Operation Epic Fury will serve as a massive catalyst for Chinese military-technical exports.[6] The PRC will likely market military-grade PNT integration to other adversarial states and non-state proxy groups across the globe, accelerating a strategic divergence from GPS reliance and severely complicating future US targeting algorithms.[46] Most critically, as the United States defense-industrial base struggles to backfill the thousands of interceptors and precision-guided munitions expended in Iran, the PLA will interpret this supply chain crisis as a rapidly closing window of US deterrence.[12] The culmination of this munitions depletion, combined with the PLA's internal, politically mandated 2027 modernization deadlines, significantly elevates the risk of a severe gray-zone crisis, maritime blockade, or preemptive kinetic scenario in the Taiwan Strait or the South China Sea within the next 24 months.[11] ## Intelligence Gaps and Collection Priorities Future intelligence collection must prioritize penetrating the severe opacity of the People's Bank of China (PBOC) and its associated institutions to map the true volume of RMB-settled barter transactions clearing through non-SWIFT architectures, specifically the CIMS-to-Kunlun nexus and the Chuxin-to-Sinosure pipeline.[37] Additionally, signals intelligence (SIGINT) resources must be heavily dedicated to intercepting and analyzing the telemetry and data packets transmitted between PLA Information Support Force nodes and Iranian command centers.[1] This is critical to determine the exact extent of real-time targeting assistance currently provided via the Yaogan and BeiDou-3 constellations.[1] The preservation of United States strategic depth and long-term hegemony necessitates not only the successful conclusion of kinetic operations in the CENTCOM area of responsibility, but the rapid, simultaneous, and systemic neutralization of the covert economic, technological, and informational lifelines that the PRC continues to extend to adversarial regimes. # References 1. Draft Report on PRC's approach to Iran conflict.pdf 2. Escalation in the Middle East: Tracking “Operation Epic Fury” Across Military and Cyber Domains | Flashpoint, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://flashpoint.io/blog/escalation-in-the-middle-east-operation-epic-fury/](https://flashpoint.io/blog/escalation-in-the-middle-east-operation-epic-fury/) 3. The Multi-Front US-Iran War and Its Worldwide Implications, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://trendsresearch.org/insight/the-multi-front-us-iran-war-and-its-worldwide-implications/](https://trendsresearch.org/insight/the-multi-front-us-iran-war-and-its-worldwide-implications/) 4. Operation Epic Fury Situation Report | Battlefield Effects and Early Strategic Signals, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.hudson.org/missile-defense/operation-epic-fury-situation-report-battlefield-effects-strategic-outcomes-can-kasapoglu](https://www.hudson.org/missile-defense/operation-epic-fury-situation-report-battlefield-effects-strategic-outcomes-can-kasapoglu) 5. China in the crossfire: Calculated moves amid the US-Iran showdown - Middle East Institute, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://mei.edu/publication/china-in-the-crossfire-calculated-moves-amid-the-us-iran-showdown/](https://mei.edu/publication/china-in-the-crossfire-calculated-moves-amid-the-us-iran-showdown/) 6. Iran turns to China's BeiDou satellites to outfox Israeli anti-drone electronic warfare defences - bne IntelliNews, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.intellinews.com/iran-turns-to-china-s-beidou-satellites-to-outfox-israeli-anti-drone-electronic-warfare-defences-430349/](https://www.intellinews.com/iran-turns-to-china-s-beidou-satellites-to-outfox-israeli-anti-drone-electronic-warfare-defences-430349/) 7. Iran conflict drives heightened espionage activity against Middle East targets | Proofpoint US, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/iran-conflict-drives-heightened-espionage-activity-against-middle-east-targets](https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/iran-conflict-drives-heightened-espionage-activity-against-middle-east-targets) 8. China is playing the long game over Iran | Chatham House ..., accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/02/china-playing-long-game-over-iran](https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/02/china-playing-long-game-over-iran) 9. Strategic patience: How China navigates the Iran war, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.thinkchina.sg/politics/strategic-patience-how-china-navigates-iran-war](https://www.thinkchina.sg/politics/strategic-patience-how-china-navigates-iran-war) 10. The Iran Strike Is All About China | Hudson Institute, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/iran-strike-all-about-china-zineb-riboua](https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/iran-strike-all-about-china-zineb-riboua) 11. Middle East War Reshapes Power Calculus For China And Taiwan - Evrim Ağacı, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/middle-east-war-reshapes-power-calculus-for-china-and-taiwan-532511](https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/middle-east-war-reshapes-power-calculus-for-china-and-taiwan-532511) 12. Opportunity for China: US depletes interceptor stocks in Middle East | The Strategist, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/opportunity-for-china-emerges-as-us-depletes-interceptor-stocks-in-middle-east/](https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/opportunity-for-china-emerges-as-us-depletes-interceptor-stocks-in-middle-east/) 13. Operation Epic Fury Situation Report: Battlefield Effects And Early Strategic Signal – Analysis, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.eurasiareview.com/11032026-operation-epic-fury-situation-report-battlefield-effects-and-early-strategic-signal-analysis/](https://www.eurasiareview.com/11032026-operation-epic-fury-situation-report-battlefield-effects-and-early-strategic-signal-analysis/) 14. 2026 Iran war - Wikipedia, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_war](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_war) 15. Epic Fury: The Campaign Against Iran’s Missile & Nuclear Infrastructure, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.csis.org/analysis/epic-fury-campaign-against-irans-missile-nuclear-infrastructure](https://www.csis.org/analysis/epic-fury-campaign-against-irans-missile-nuclear-infrastructure) 16. Unpacking Iran’s Drone Campaign in the Gulf: Early Lessons for Future Drone Warfare, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.csis.org/analysis/unpacking-irans-drone-campaign-gulf-early-lessons-future-drone-warfare](https://www.csis.org/analysis/unpacking-irans-drone-campaign-gulf-early-lessons-future-drone-warfare) 17. Operation "Epic Fury:" SITREP (09 MAR 2026), accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://ict.org.il/operation-epic-fury-sitrep-09-mar-2026/](https://ict.org.il/operation-epic-fury-sitrep-09-mar-2026/) 18. China's Middle East policy shift from "hedging" to "wedging" - Atlantic Council, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/chinas-middle-east-policy-shift-from-hedging-to-wedging/](https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/chinas-middle-east-policy-shift-from-hedging-to-wedging/) 19. China is trying to create a wedge between the US and Gulf allies. Washington should take note. - Atlantic Council, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/china-is-trying-to-create-a-wedge-between-the-us-and-gulf-allies-washington-should-take-note/](https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/china-is-trying-to-create-a-wedge-between-the-us-and-gulf-allies-washington-should-take-note/) 20. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on March 5, 2026, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/202603/t20260305_11869424.html](https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/202603/t20260305_11869424.html) 21. Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: Assessments, Implications, Prospects - German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP), accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://dgap.org/system/files/article_pdfs/Russia-Ukraine_CIRSPolicyBrief_2025.pdf](https://dgap.org/system/files/article_pdfs/Russia-Ukraine_CIRSPolicyBrief_2025.pdf) 22. China Issues Stark Warning Over U.S. Military Ambitions in Palestinian Territories, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/02/21/china-issues-stark-warning-over-u-s-military-ambitions-in-palestinian-territories/](https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/02/21/china-issues-stark-warning-over-u-s-military-ambitions-in-palestinian-territories/) 23. China, the United States, and the Reconfiguration of Middle East Geopolitics: New Possibilities for Conflict and Order - Security in Context, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.securityincontext.org/posts/china-the-united-states-and-the-reconfiguration-of-middle-east-geopolitics-new-possibilities-for-conflict-and-order](https://www.securityincontext.org/posts/china-the-united-states-and-the-reconfiguration-of-middle-east-geopolitics-new-possibilities-for-conflict-and-order) 24. China to send Middle East special envoy to work for deescalation of tensions, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://english.news.cn/20260305/2b670b5862204d92867230f021ba4fd0/c.html](https://english.news.cn/20260305/2b670b5862204d92867230f021ba4fd0/c.html) 25. HE GCCSG Receives Special Envoy of the Chinese Government on the Middle East Issue; Emphasises Importance of International Efforts to Condemn Iranian Attacks and Calls for Immediate Cessation of Military Actions, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.gcc-sg.org/en/MediaCenter/News/Pages/news2026-3-8-5.aspx](https://www.gcc-sg.org/en/MediaCenter/News/Pages/news2026-3-8-5.aspx) 26. Special Envoy Zhai Jun of the Chinese Government on the Middle East Issue Meets with Secretary General of the Gulf Cooperation Council Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi_Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/wjbxw/202603/t20260309_11871762.html](https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/wjbxw/202603/t20260309_11871762.html) 27. China steps up diplomatic push for peace in Mideast - [Ecns.cn](https://ecns.cn/) , accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.ecns.cn/m/news/society/2026-03-12/detail-ihfaqfsq8281703.shtml](https://www.ecns.cn/m/news/society/2026-03-12/detail-ihfaqfsq8281703.shtml) 28. Special Envoy Zhai Jun of the Chinese Government on the Middle East Issue Meets with Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud_Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/wjbxw/202603/t20260309_11871763.html](https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/wjbxw/202603/t20260309_11871763.html) 29. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun's Regular Press Conference on March 10, 2026, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/202603/t20260310_11872314.html](https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/202603/t20260310_11872314.html) 30. China's Facilitation of Sanctions and Export Control Evasion, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.uscc.gov/research/chinas-facilitation-sanctions-and-export-control-evasion](https://www.uscc.gov/research/chinas-facilitation-sanctions-and-export-control-evasion) 31. Dark Fleet Lifeline: Why Iranian Crude Still Flows to China Amid Operation Epic Fury, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://debuglies.com/2026/03/11/dark-fleet-lifeline-why-iranian-crude-still-flows-to-china-amid-operation-epic-fury/](https://debuglies.com/2026/03/11/dark-fleet-lifeline-why-iranian-crude-still-flows-to-china-amid-operation-epic-fury/) 32. Treasury Increases Pressure on Chinese Importers of Iranian Oil ..., accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0090](https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0090) 33. How Iran, China, and Russia Use the Shadow Fleet to Evade US Sanctions - MEI, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://mei.edu/policymemo/how-iran-china-and-russia-use-the-shadow-fleet-to-evade-us-sanctions/](https://mei.edu/policymemo/how-iran-china-and-russia-use-the-shadow-fleet-to-evade-us-sanctions/) 34. Iran's Regime Sophisticated Playbook to Circumvent Global Sanctions - NCRI, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/terrorism-a-fundamentalism/irans-regime-sophisticated-playbook-to-circumvent-global-sanctions/](https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/terrorism-a-fundamentalism/irans-regime-sophisticated-playbook-to-circumvent-global-sanctions/) 35. Behind Iran's War Chest, an Oil 'Lifeline' from China - Kharon, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.kharon.com/brief/iran-war-oil-china-trade-shadow-fleet-sanctions](https://www.kharon.com/brief/iran-war-oil-china-trade-shadow-fleet-sanctions) 36. Clearing the Way to Renminbi Domination: CIPS, Antitrust, and Currency Competition - Scholarship Repository, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://ir.law.fsu.edu/context/lr/article/2786/viewcontent/51FlaStULRev457.pdf](https://ir.law.fsu.edu/context/lr/article/2786/viewcontent/51FlaStULRev457.pdf) 37. Treasury Targets Iranian Network Evading Sanctions and Enabling Oppression, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0220](https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0220) 38. A China-Russia SWIFT Alternative Will Not Undermine Iran Sanctions, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/china-russia-swift-alternative-will-not-undermine-iran-sanctions](https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/china-russia-swift-alternative-will-not-undermine-iran-sanctions) 39. Sanctions, SWIFT, and China's Cross-Border Interbank Payments System - CSIS, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.csis.org/analysis/sanctions-swift-and-chinas-cross-border-interbank-payments-system](https://www.csis.org/analysis/sanctions-swift-and-chinas-cross-border-interbank-payments-system) 40. China uses secret network to pay Iran for oil - WSJ, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.iranintl.com/en/202510060867](https://www.iranintl.com/en/202510060867) 41. How China Secretly Pays Iran for Oil and Avoids U.S. Sanctions | Iran Watch, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.iranwatch.org/news-brief/how-china-secretly-pays-iran-oil-avoids-us-sanctions](https://www.iranwatch.org/news-brief/how-china-secretly-pays-iran-oil-avoids-us-sanctions) 42. Hidden Trade Between Beijing and Tehran Exposed - WANA, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://wanaen.com/hidden-trade-between-beijing-and-tehran-exposed/](https://wanaen.com/hidden-trade-between-beijing-and-tehran-exposed/) 43. China trades cars for Iranian copper as sanctions revive barter economy - BBG, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.iranintl.com/en/202510060478](https://www.iranintl.com/en/202510060478) 44. Iran's secret barter-system with China to export oil while avoiding US sanctions - Al Arabiya, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2025/10/06/iran-s-secret-bartersystem-with-china-to-export-oil-while-avoiding-us-sanctions](https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2025/10/06/iran-s-secret-bartersystem-with-china-to-export-oil-while-avoiding-us-sanctions) 45. GPS Crippled, BeiDou Takes Over: How Iran's Satellite Pivot During the 12-Day War Exposed Western Navigation Vulnerabilities - Defence Security Asia, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/iran-beidou-satellite-navigation-twelve-day-war-gps-jamming-israel-electronic-warfare/](https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/iran-beidou-satellite-navigation-twelve-day-war-gps-jamming-israel-electronic-warfare/) 46. Iran turns to China's BeiDou satellites to outfox Israeli anti-drone electronic warfare defences - bne IntelliNews, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.intellinews.com/iran-turns-to-china-s-beidou-satellites-to-outfox-israeli-anti-drone-electronic-warfare-defences-430349/?source=asia](https://www.intellinews.com/iran-turns-to-china-s-beidou-satellites-to-outfox-israeli-anti-drone-electronic-warfare-defences-430349/?source=asia) 47. Iran says 25-year China agreement enters implementation stage | Nuclear Energy News, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/1/15/iran-says-25-year-china-agreement-enters-implementation-stage](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/1/15/iran-says-25-year-china-agreement-enters-implementation-stage) 48. Is Iran using China's BeiDou system to launch 'accurate' missile strikes? - The Times of India, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/defence/international/is-iran-using-chinas-beidou-system-to-launch-accurate-missile-strikes/articleshow/129501537.cms](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/defence/international/is-iran-using-chinas-beidou-system-to-launch-accurate-missile-strikes/articleshow/129501537.cms) 49. Iran turns to China's BeiDou satellites to outfox Israeli anti-drone electronic warfare defences - bne IntelliNews, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.intellinews.com/iran-turns-to-china-s-beidou-satellites-to-outfox-israeli-anti-drone-electronic-warfare-defences-430349/?source=iran](https://www.intellinews.com/iran-turns-to-china-s-beidou-satellites-to-outfox-israeli-anti-drone-electronic-warfare-defences-430349/?source=iran) 50. China's Military Power Report: Reimagining Strategic Assessment for Contemporary Indo-Pacific Dynamics in 2025 - [https://debuglies.com](https://debuglies.com/) , accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://debuglies.com/2025/11/10/chinas-military-power-report-reimagining-strategic-assessment-for-contemporary-indo-pacific-dynamics-in-2025/](https://debuglies.com/2025/11/10/chinas-military-power-report-reimagining-strategic-assessment-for-contemporary-indo-pacific-dynamics-in-2025/) 51. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2025 - [War.gov](https://war.gov/) , accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://media.defense.gov/2025/Dec/23/2003849070/-1/-1/1/ANNUAL-REPORT-TO-CONGRESS-MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2025.PDF](https://media.defense.gov/2025/Dec/23/2003849070/-1/-1/1/ANNUAL-REPORT-TO-CONGRESS-MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2025.PDF) 52. Military Intelligence Benefits for China in the US-Israel War Against Iran - SpecialEurasia, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.specialeurasia.com/2026/03/03/military-intelligence-china-us/](https://www.specialeurasia.com/2026/03/03/military-intelligence-china-us/) 53. Iran Turned to Russia, China for Missiles After 12-Day War - Defense Security Monitor, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://dsm.forecastinternational.com/2026/02/27/iran-turned-to-russia-china-for-missiles-after-12-day-war/](https://dsm.forecastinternational.com/2026/02/27/iran-turned-to-russia-china-for-missiles-after-12-day-war/) 54. China Yj-12 Missile: Iran almost bought China's supersonic 'aircraft-carrier killer': How it could have changed the Middle East war - The Times of India, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/defence/international/iran-almost-bought-chinas-cutting-edge-aircraft-carrier-killer-how-it-could-have-changed-the-war/articleshow/129447969.cms](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/defence/international/iran-almost-bought-chinas-cutting-edge-aircraft-carrier-killer-how-it-could-have-changed-the-war/articleshow/129447969.cms) 55. China close to giving Iran a ship-killer as US carriers close in - Asia Times, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://asiatimes.com/2026/02/china-close-to-giving-iran-a-ship-killer-as-us-carriers-close-in/](https://asiatimes.com/2026/02/china-close-to-giving-iran-a-ship-killer-as-us-carriers-close-in/) 56. China & Taiwan Update, March 6, 2026 | ISW, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/china-taiwan-update-march-6-2026/](https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/china-taiwan-update-march-6-2026/) 57. Real-Time Analysis: Supreme Leader Choice Shows Regime Losing Coherence, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://newlinesinstitute.org/middle-east-center/real-time-analysis-supreme-leader-choice-shows-regime-losing-coherence/](https://newlinesinstitute.org/middle-east-center/real-time-analysis-supreme-leader-choice-shows-regime-losing-coherence/) 58. Who Will Be Iran's Next Supreme Leader? | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2026/03/iran-supreme-leader-succession-khamenei-mojtaba-arafi](https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2026/03/iran-supreme-leader-succession-khamenei-mojtaba-arafi) 59. Mojtaba Khamenei: The shadow prince who became Iran's supreme leader, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603083539](https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603083539) 60. From apology to choosing Mojtaba Khamenei: The growing rift between Iranian leadership, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/from-apology-to-choosing-mojtaba-khamenei-the-growing-rift-between-iranian-leadership/articleshow/129340736.cms](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/from-apology-to-choosing-mojtaba-khamenei-the-growing-rift-between-iranian-leadership/articleshow/129340736.cms) 61. 2026 Iranian supreme leader election - Wikipedia, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iranian_supreme_leader_election](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iranian_supreme_leader_election) 62. Iran council has ‘chosen new Supreme Leader’, with a big hint towards Ali Khamenei’s son Mojtaba, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/iran-council-has-consensus-on-new-leader-with-a-hint-towards-ali-khamenei-s-son-mojtaba-101772966701860.html](https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/iran-council-has-consensus-on-new-leader-with-a-hint-towards-ali-khamenei-s-son-mojtaba-101772966701860.html) 63. The architectural collapse of middle eastern security and the escalation of high-intensity multi-domain warfare (2025–2026) - [https://debuglies.com](https://debuglies.com/) , accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://debuglies.com/2026/03/04/the-architectural-collapse-of-middle-eastern-security-and-the-escalation-of-high-intensity-multi-domain-warfare-2025-2026/](https://debuglies.com/2026/03/04/the-architectural-collapse-of-middle-eastern-security-and-the-escalation-of-high-intensity-multi-domain-warfare-2025-2026/) 64. Succession, Tehran style, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4478983/iran-ali-khamenei-democracy-transition/](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4478983/iran-ali-khamenei-democracy-transition/) 65. CHINA-IRAN: A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/China-Iran--A%20Limited%20Partnership.pdf](https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/China-Iran--A%20Limited%20Partnership.pdf) 66. Anthropic is already at war, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://mronline.org/2026/03/09/anthropic-is-already-at-war/](https://mronline.org/2026/03/09/anthropic-is-already-at-war/) 67. China Breaking News & Headlines | South China Morning Post, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.scmp.com/news/china](https://www.scmp.com/news/china) 68. NSO Security Team News - NetSource One, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.nsoit.com/Cybersecurity-News.aspx](https://www.nsoit.com/Cybersecurity-News.aspx) 69. Chapter 5 - China and the Middle East, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/Chapter_5--China_and_the_Middle_East.pdf](https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/Chapter_5--China_and_the_Middle_East.pdf) 70. US operation in Venezuela: Why Taiwan is not 'next' - European Policy Centre, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.epc.eu/publication/us-operation-in-venezuela-why-taiwan-is-not-next/](https://www.epc.eu/publication/us-operation-in-venezuela-why-taiwan-is-not-next/) 71. The U.S. Needs More Munitions To Deter China | The Heritage Foundation, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/the-us-needs-more-munitions-deter-china](https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/the-us-needs-more-munitions-deter-china) 72. Archers Need Arrows: Deficiencies in U.S. Submarine Munitions, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://cimsec.org/archers-need-arrows-deficiencies-in-u-s-submarine-munitions/](https://cimsec.org/archers-need-arrows-deficiencies-in-u-s-submarine-munitions/) 73. TIDALWAVE: Strategic Exploitation and Sustainment in a U.S.-China Conflict [REDACTED VERS.] Heritage Foundation : r/LessCredibleDefence - Reddit, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.reddit.com/r/LessCredibleDefence/comments/1qig2nj/tidalwave_strategic_exploitation_and_sustainment/](https://www.reddit.com/r/LessCredibleDefence/comments/1qig2nj/tidalwave_strategic_exploitation_and_sustainment/) 74. OPERATION ROARING LION — INTELLIGENCE CODEX - Succession Decapitation · Proxy Retaliation Cascade · Munitions Attrition Horizon - [https://debuglies.com](https://debuglies.com/) , accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://debuglies.com/2026/03/03/operation-roaring-lion-intelligence-codex-succession-decapitation-%C2%B7-proxy-retaliation-cascade-%C2%B7-munitions-attrition-horizon/](https://debuglies.com/2026/03/03/operation-roaring-lion-intelligence-codex-succession-decapitation-%C2%B7-proxy-retaliation-cascade-%C2%B7-munitions-attrition-horizon/) 75. PLA Overseas Operations in 2035 - National Defense University, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/stratforum/SF-309.pdf](https://www.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/stratforum/SF-309.pdf) 76. Chapter 8 - China's Evolving Counter-Intervention Capabilities and the Role of Indo-Pacific Allies, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/Chapter_8--Chinas_Evolving_Counter-Intervention_Capabilities.pdf](https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/Chapter_8--Chinas_Evolving_Counter-Intervention_Capabilities.pdf) 77. U.S. Department of Defense/War Annual Reports to Congress on China's Military Power—2000 to 2025—Download Complete Set + Read Highlights Here - Andrew Erickson, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.andrewerickson.com/2025/12/u-s-department-of-defense-war-annual-reports-to-congress-on-chinas-military-power-2000-to-2025-download-complete-set-read-highlights-here/](https://www.andrewerickson.com/2025/12/u-s-department-of-defense-war-annual-reports-to-congress-on-chinas-military-power-2000-to-2025-download-complete-set-read-highlights-here/) 78. (PDF) China and its region: An assessment of hegemonic prospects - ResearchGate, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363080605_China_and_its_region_An_assessment_of_hegemonic_prospects](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363080605_China_and_its_region_An_assessment_of_hegemonic_prospects) 79. TEN MORE FOR TAIWAN: Policy Recommendations to Deter Chinese Communist Party Aggression - Select Committee on the CCP |, accessed on March 12, 2026, [https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/ten-more-for-taiwan-final_0.pdf](https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/ten-more-for-taiwan-final_0.pdf) - [ ](https://twitter.com/LuizHSBrandao) [ Luiz H. S. Brandão ](https://twitter.com/LuizHSBrandao) [ @LuizHSBrandao ](https://twitter.com/LuizHSBrandao) Intelligence Analyst and Strategic Studies Researcher focusing on Hybrid Threats & Cognitive Warfare |   [@_Intellecta](https://twitter.com/_Intellecta) ;  [@negisc_gepsi](https://twitter.com/negisc_gepsi) ;  [@DiretoFront](https://twitter.com/DiretoFront)